About your Search

20111205
20111205
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
was established by david cameron followed by questions of cell phone hacking working for rupert murdoch. this is a little over two hours. >> please sit down and make yourself comfortable. >> your full name. >> alice stair john campbell. >> now, you're hear today to provide testimony. since then, four things have happened. first of all, i believe you've signed the statement is that right? and therefore it is evidence. you've made three minor changes on the version that was provided. may i just identify for their benefit. >> yep. >> i'm working from the pagination of the right and giving the last five numbers. page 21094. right in the middle of the page after the news of the world in italics a name has been redacted. >> yep. >> that's in line with mr. hears' evidence. final paragraph. >> a manuscript from the version which is going to be on the screen. in substitution for on the fowcation. >> yep. >> and then page 211019, mr. campbell, the last two lines. sorry. the final sentence running on to the start of the next page, that is now being deleted. is this correct? >> that's correct. >> n
not -- the reason i do often concentrate on the mail is because it is the most distinct. rupert murdoch is the most powerful in the world. the mail is extremely successful, but it is utterly the product of one person. there is nothing that goes in that newspaper that is not decided by hamaim. what ever is being written is probably being decided by him. that is how that paperworks. within the media industry, it is seen as an incredibly successful product, which it is. one thing they decide is that an organization or a profession or people on strike today or anybody that had anything to do with tony blair, once they decide they are one of his targets, you will never read anything about negativity in that newspaper. to my mind, the code says you must distinguish between facts, comments, and conjectures. they only take the facts in the agenda and infuse them with comments and drive their agenda through every single headline, and it is the whole thing. >> aren't you talking about balance rather than distinguishing between fact and conjectured? aren't you saying that they are making a strategic decision
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2